comex on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:10:03 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Fwd: Oracle report |
On Thursday 21 June 2007, Peter Cooper Jr. wrote: > "Daniel Lepage" <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > That said, I do strongly feel that our ruleset should be amended so > > that collective entities can become players, subject to restrictions > > (for example, no player should be able to create a society containing > > only emself and make it a player, nor should N players be able to form > > N factorial distinct Societies and turn them all into players). But as > > it stands right now, the ruleset does not permit this. > > If you want to give societies voting privileges (and proposing > privileges) I could see supporting that, but making them actual > *players* seems iffy and ripe for abuse to me. This has been the subject of much debate on the Agoran forums, by the way, as a similar situation exists in Agora. I would personally prefer to keep Societies non-player Outsiders in B with a different set of game actions. Maybe some things can be done by Societies that cannot be done by players.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss