Re: [s-d] Are we playing?

[Eugene Meidinger <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, aperidodic would be a better word but non-linear would probably
also apply about what I was thinking. I'm thinking about having a lot of
the stuff happen independent of similar events. For example, the time to
vote on each proposition might happen at different times.

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 18:20 +0200, Joel Uckelman wrote:
> Thus spake Eugene Meidinger:
> > Maybe we need to have a non linear schedule. Things happen when the
> > initiating player makes them happen and the person who causes them does
> > the brunt of the work. I'll post a list of rules today and hopefully
> > someone can legalize them for me.
> 
> I think you mean an aperiodic schedule? A nonlinear one would have you
> branching off in various ways.
> 

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss