Iain Scott on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:44:09 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 3

On 2/26/07, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit a Consultation:
> {{
> Question: All Proposals created since Rule 2-2 was last amended have Proposal
> Numbers of null.  True or false?
> Reasoning:
> [2-2] "The Administrator must then assign it a new Proposal Number that is
> greater than all previously used Proposal Numbers as soon as e can."
> [1-10] "A Game Action is defined as any activity specified by the rules to
> be a Game Action."
> [1-15] "If a game action is not explicitly permitted in the rules, the game
> prohibits it."
> Unbeliever: Optional

I would have thought that the [2-2] snippet falls under the spirit ,
if not nescisairily the exact wording, of:

[1-10]Text to the effect that "any player may do X" should be
interpreted to mean that X is a Game Action; but such a declaration
implies that only players may take the Game Action X (unless another
declaration permits other Outsiders to as well).

spoon-discuss mailing list