Re: [s-d] Someone's gotta do it

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> There's the rub. It's not likely that said unanimity will occur.
>>
>> All Players agreed to be governed by the Rules when
>> requesting to join the Game. To cavalierly flout the text
>> of a Rule by assuming a stance of "this is what we think
>> a Rule REALLY means" when in fact this is not what
>> a Rule actually states is to undermine the very foundation
>> of the Game.
> 
> Well, I'm only talking about one nweek.  And in fact in this case only
> Peter has to agree - he's the rule tag administrator.  I'm just saying
> that yes, we need to propose a change, but I still think if Peter
> agrees we could play this week.

there's only one way to find out.

>> I could go on. It's not necessary. Be careful what you
>> propose. It might come around and bite you on the arse.
> 
> ::shrug:: if someone makes a mistake in a proposal then it bites us
> *all* on the arse, friend.  Not me especially.  I mean, a nice turn of
> phrase, but not entirely sure what you are trying to say here.

I think it was just a generic you, meaning any nomic player, not 
targeted at you specifically.


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss