Re: [s-d] RFJ 009

Peter Cooper Jr. on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:52:59 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] RFJ 009

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] RFJ 009
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:52:53 -0500
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <45B9C624.9010400@xxxxxxxxx> (Antonio Dolcetta's message of "Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:13:08 +0100")
Mail-followup-to: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
References: <45B9C624.9010400@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)

Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> What's happening with RFJ 009 ?
> The wiki lists it as pending and assigned to Sproingie
>
> is it an orphan because the RFJ rules do not exist anymore ?

That is an excellent question.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] RFJ 009
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Draft proposal: Legally binding contracts
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Draft proposal: Legally binding contracts
Previous by thread: [s-d] RFJ 009
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answering Consultation 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread