Antonio Dolcetta on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:37:01 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections |
shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > But in your system it doesn't take a majority of the players to unseat > a post holder - just a majority of the people who voted in your > election. yes, right, and I believe it's a good thing. At most I could understand making it dependent on a quorum of players as per the Justice rules. We have currently 18 players, you would need 10 votes! Also if you think about the real alternative we have now, which would be a proposal, it's the same, the majority of the people who vote on it. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss