Re: [s-d] B Nomic in State Of Emergency

Peter Cooper Jr. on Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:17:27 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] B Nomic in State Of Emergency

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:17:21 -0500
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <831514EE-D057-4AA6-B83A-052314545DAB@xxxxxxxxxxx> (Daniel Lepage's message of "Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:12:39 -0500")
Mail-followup-to: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
References: <uirg9gjyr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <831514EE-D057-4AA6-B83A-052314545DAB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)

Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Refresh prop idea: make the rule change from my prop earlier today,  
> destroy that prop and Iain's most recent prop, and give Peter 5  
> points for spotting the bug.

If by "Iain" you mean "Antonio", I think that'll work fine. At least,
I don't spot any problems on first glance. You don't even need to
destroy the props, as we can just vote to not pass them.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
  - From: Iain Scott
- Re: [s-d] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] B Nomic in State Of Emergency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread