Iain Scott on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:51:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] ruletag question |
On 12/15/06, shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx <shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm nearly ready to propose ruletag but I'd like to ask a question first. > > How do people feel about a subgame where the actions are posted in > secret to a post holder? The post holder is required to declare the > players' states at a given point in the week, after which no more game > actions are allowed. > > I'm the newbie here. Can anyone see problems with this? Don't like it? > > Ruletag would work without, I think. But if it would work it would be > better this way. No race conditions... > One disadvantage is that this would cause more work for the post-holder... not necessarily a show-stopper, though. -- cheers, Iain _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss