bd on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:46:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] My first proposals of the New Era |
Daniel Lepage wrote: > On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:17 AM, bd wrote: > >> Daniel Lepage wrote: >>> I submit the following three proposals: >>> Create the following Victory Condition: >>> {{ >>> === Win By Points === >>> Trigger: The number of points a player possesses becomes greater than >>> 100. >>> >>> Victor: The player with the greatest number of points, or all players >>> tied for the greatest number of points. >>> >>> Trophy: A gleaming steel rapier. >>> >>> Armageddon: All points are destroyed. >>> }} >>> }} >> My __Virtual particles__ prop will need to conflict with this, >> unless it >> uses 'score' instead of points, as a player could flux 100 >> point/antipoint pairs for an instant (which would leave their score at >> -100 after all the points are destroyed, but if that's the price of >> victory...) > > I was hoping nobody would notice that :D. I guess I should've waited > until closer to Voting to propose this. Nice try though :) Maybe I should've kept my silence and used it myself first... >>> __More Ways to Win__ >>> >>> Create the following three Victory Conditions: >>> >>> === Win By Dictatorship === >>> >>> Trigger: A rule is created whose text reads, in its entirety, "The >>> player named X may change the gamestate in any way, at any time.", >>> where X is replaced by the name of a current player. >>> Protagonist: The player whose name is in the aforementioned rule. >>> Trophy: A Jeweled Crown and Scepter. >>> Armageddon: None - the dictator could simply turn one off if there >>> were one. However, it is considered good form for the dictator to >>> close whatever loophole allowed em to become dictator, and then to >>> repeal eir dictatorship. >> Does this need to be legislated? > > No, but I thought it might be useful to set standards for what one > ought to do when gaining total dominance over the game. > > That's another region where a set of rules for "proper etiquette" > would be useful. > More like a FAQ really; etiquette can't really be written into the rules. ... can it? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss