Re: [s-d] [s-b] nweek 113 ballot

bd on Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:32:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] nweek 113 ballot

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] nweek 113 ballot
From: bd <nomic@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:31:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <2f4350400612101329s67414988y7b87c8fdab5be5f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <uwt505qbz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612101326sa08e267h4e8d4dfd0d0ec05f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612101329s67414988y7b87c8fdab5be5f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

>> 43      Monotonicity is rather dull, don't you think?
> ABSTAIN.  [[No game effect.  Why?]]

This allows the Administrator to skip sequence numbers in the event 
we're not entirely sure whether an object exists or not.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] nweek 113 ballot
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] $wgLogo
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Transactional Proposals
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Thrid
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] nweek 113 ballot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread