Re: [s-d] $wgLogo

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 10 December 2006 4:43, shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Therefore, if there is not a disagreement as to the interpretation of
> the rules, a player cannot submit an RFJ.  The only way I can judge
> what a disagreement is about is by reading the statement.  I don't
> have the right to guess or estimate what the disagreement is about
> based on the discussion forum, especially since it isn't part of the
> game.
An RFJ's Reasoning, however, is a part of the game.  Why not use it to 
understand what the disagreement is about?

Attachment: pgphZbJq2TsGc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss