Chuck Adams on Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:05:10 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] nweek 113 ballot

Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:
> Chuck Adams <cja987@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> 22	You need to *work* to win
>> AGAINST [[Because of the retroactive win removal clause -- why punish 
>> the clever people?]]
> Because I was punishing *myself*, and otherwise everyone could just
> claim a bazillion wins three seconds before this passes.
> Should I just have left 1 win behind for me
Oops, I didn't see the name of the proposer (that it's not on the 
proposal page doesn't help), and I thought the loophole had already been 
closed and this was just revoking those wins.  Too late to change my 
vote, but if the loophole's still open, then I suppose everyone else 
should vote yes.


spoon-discuss mailing list