Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

shadowfirebird on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 01:59:24 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:59:18 +0000
In-reply-to: <9EC4FC22-D0D1-4672-A919-4DF01BE42131@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200612072152.21048.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <4578E73E.10704@xxxxxxx> <9EC4FC22-D0D1-4672-A919-4DF01BE42131@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I was sort of hoping that no-one would be dumb enough to vote for both
legal mode and monopoly mode.  :)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: bd
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Judgement on RFJ 5.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: conflicts and dependencies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread