Re: [s-d] [s-b] 112.11 Administrator's Update

David E. Smith on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:13:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 112.11 Administrator's Update

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 112.11 Administrator's Update
From: "David E. Smith" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:12:46 -0600
In-reply-to: <3e8340490611291946o1518b48ft8c9df4e090bfa298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <u64cxeqbz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <456E5229.1020909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3e8340490611291946o1518b48ft8c9df4e090bfa298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0

all players wrote:

> Your message was sent to spoon-discuss.

Okay, I'm apparently too stupid to live.

Can someone tell me why we even have two separate mailing lists? 
Couldn't we just use one mailing list and, if it's business, put "this 
is official business" or something in the email?

dave
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] 112.11 Administrator's Update
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 112.11 Administrator's Update
  - From: David E. Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 112.11 Administrator's Update
  - From: all players

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] RFC: Rule Tag
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] RFC: Rule Tag
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 112.11 Administrator's Update
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] 112.11 Administrator's Update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread