Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Remove Revision Numbers

["Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/26/06 1:21:29 PM Wonko sent:
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Remove Revision Numbers
>
> But the wiki does this already. We don't need to clutter the pages  
> further.
>
> -- 
> Wonko
>
Just looked, and I see that the pages are date/time
stamped for last modification.
I always kept a hardcopy of the ruleset in a binder
with each rule on a separate page.
After rules were changed at the beginning of an nweek,
I could conveniently flip through the pages and compare
the Rule/Revision number on my hardcopy to the current
value in the wiki to determine if I needed to update my
copy.
As far as I can tell, now the Rules are all on a single page,
and to maintain a hardcopy, I need to reprint the entire
ruleset even if only a single rule is changed.

Is it convenient to provide individual rules on their
own unique pages, such that they can be printed out
singly? I would save a tree if I could.

Triller


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss