Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2

Joel Uckelman on Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:09:10 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:09:08 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:52:25 GMT." <2f4350400611220852s4cd016ddkd4bd138e5fb4ac01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thus spake shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx:
> I've just discovered this.  I agree, it's non-perfect.
> 
> Could we set the reply-to for business to the discussion list?

The reply-to for business *is* the discussion list.

-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
  - From: Eugene Meidinger

References:
- Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Conflict resolution
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread