Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2

[antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx]

That's the way it is already

----- Original Message ----
From: "shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx" <shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:52:25 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2

I've just discovered this.  I agree, it's non-perfect.

Could we set the reply-to for business to the discussion list?

On 11/22/06, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This does make sense, except that when a player replies to a message
> on -business, they may or may not be doing business. When the reply-
> to for -business was -business, we frequently got nonbusiness on the
> list, because players would just hit "reply". As it stands right now,
> the reply-to for -business is -discuss, which prevents that, but
> which sometimes means that a player meaning to post to -business
> accidentally sends to -discuss. One method of combating this was to
> allow a Minister in charge of tracking something to recognize
> relevant action that were sent to the wrong forum; e would be
> required to notify the business forum that e was doing this.
>
> Or we could just change the reply-to so that -business replies to
> itself by default, and we could live with the inevitable scraps of
> discussion on -business.



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss