Daniel Lepage on Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:33:40 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2 |
This does make sense, except that when a player replies to a message on -business, they may or may not be doing business. When the reply- to for -business was -business, we frequently got nonbusiness on the list, because players would just hit "reply". As it stands right now, the reply-to for -business is -discuss, which prevents that, but which sometimes means that a player meaning to post to -business accidentally sends to -discuss. One method of combating this was to allow a Minister in charge of tracking something to recognize relevant action that were sent to the wrong forum; e would be required to notify the business forum that e was doing this. Or we could just change the reply-to so that -business replies to itself by default, and we could live with the inevitable scraps of discussion on -business. -- Wonko On Nov 22, 2006, at 4:48 AM, Andy Jones wrote: > Actually, I'd vote against that. > > I want to see actual game stuff on business; idle chat on discussions. > Makes perfect sense to me. Sorry. > > On 11/22/06, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> [[arrgh, i hate the distinction between discuss and business, has >>> anyone thought of a way to get rid of the distinction ?]] >> >> In the past, we had a rule that allowed a minister (when we had >> ministers) to recognize an action taken on a Discussion forum if done >> within a certain amount of time. See the second paragraph of rule >> 1-3/5 on Wonko's archive of our prior ruleset at >> <http://www.nomic.net/~wonko/current_ruleset.txt>. >> Presumably, something similar could be made with me being the >> Administrator recognizing actions. Although, right now there's no >> definition of "recognizing" and I'm just the one who's reponsible for >> making sure players know about the state of the game, so it may be a >> bit more complicated to put it in. >> >> -- >> Peter C. >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> > > > -- > It's Like This > > Even the Samurai > Have teddy bears > And even the teddy bears > Get drunk > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss Daniel Lepage dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss