Peter Cooper Jr. on Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:21:16 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on |
antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx writes: > Do you think this is sufficent ? > > I amend my proposal: > it's the game of B! > {{ > From now on, ndays, nweeks, nyears, ntime, and ndelays shall be > known as bdays, bweeks, byears, btime, and bdelays respectivley. > Replace the word "nday" with "bday" throughout the ruleset. > Replace the word "nweek" with "bweek" throughout the ruleset. > Replace the word "nyear" with "byear" throughout the ruleset. > Replace the word "ntime" with "btime" throughout the ruleset. > Replace the word "ndelay" with "bdelay" throughout the ruleset. > }} I think that would do the trick, especially if you spell "respectively" right. I currently don't have any sort of Executive Tidiness powers. I also can't yet recognize amendments (such as this) that were sent to a Discussion Forum instead of a Public one. -- Peter C. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss