|Daniel Lepage on Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:39:40 -0600 (CST)|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Superpowers: Dead or Alive?|
Another thing I'd enjoy playing is a game of Capture the Flag across the House. We'd have to put some thought into the structure of the House, but it could get very interesting, especially with superpowers and interesting Room Ordinances.
My third suggestion is to create a bunch of "Nemesis" SuperPowers. No more than one can ever exist in the House at a time. The Nemesis powers would all be absurdly powerful, but all the other players would get a big group bonus if the Nemesis were destroyed, so we'd all want to gang up on the Nemesis. With enough different Nemesis powers, we could get a number of nearly unique subgames out of this.
Anyway, that's my 2.5 cents (.5 because the first suggestion isn't really mine).
-- Wonko On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Jake Eakle wrote:
Ah! Wonko! I was wondering if you were still alive.I have been looking over all the house-related stuff, and it seems what we are lacking is a goal, of any sort whatsoever, really. Yeah, I guess if you beat someone up you can get their stuff, but that stuff can only really helpyou beat more people up.I guess a few of the Talismans and Rooms can affect other parts of the game (voting, for example), but these seem limited in scope and not really worththe effort of fighting for.Perhaps we need a set of rewards for killing people beyond what they were carrying, or stuff in the house to fight over. For instance, maybe once every nweek a treasure could spawn in a random room and everyone would have to race to get there and get it and defend it and get it out, or to another room, or something. I haven't worked out any details, but something alongthese lines might help get people interested in actually doing stuff. Another good thing might be for there to be a way to Win. It should bereally hard (Kill everyone else at least once within an nweek, or own one of every talisman, or... something.) but it should exist, just so there is anoverall goal to strive for.If I get a chunk of time, I'll sit down and try to beat some of these ideas into a Motion, but until then, if anyone else wants to steal them they arevery welcome to. Personman On 2/13/06, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The "Superpowers" page is from a previous, failed attempt to get a superpower system off the ground. The "SuperPowers" page is the current attempt to get a superpower system off the ground. So far this attempt also seems to be failing, due to a general lack of House activity. In my case, this stems from not having enough time to actually look over everything to do with the House to figure out what I can do and what I might want to do. If I had more time, I'd try to find a better way to represent the state of the House so that everyone could easily see everything they can do, but lacking such time, I'm waiting in the hopes that somebody else will come up with such a representation. -- Wonko On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:11 PM, comex wrote:On 2/13/06, Jake Eakle <jseakle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:They are in the rules, but the list is filed under historical, and they refer to things that don't exist anymore. Should the rule be gotten rid of? Or should a new set be created?I believe that there are two lists on the wiki: SuperPowers and Superpowers. Or something like that. One is current, one is not. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams, _Last Chance To See_ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
"This gubblick contains many nonsklarkish English flutzpahs, but the overall pluggandisp can be glorked from context" -David Moser, quoted by Douglas Hofstadter in his "Metamagical Themas" column in the January 1981 "Scientific American"
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss