[s-d] Re: A (possibly) Serious Oversight

["Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In my current Prop correcting some House problems,
> I'm guilty of a potentially serious oversight.
> I failed to place Aunt Mabel's Soul in the Attic!

I see no reason in your prop why that would be a problem. The Soul of
Great Aunt Mabel, whatever that is, becomes bound to the first first
talisman given out.

But I'm not sure if The Soul Of Great Aunt Mabel is a Soul in the
sense the rest of the game uses it... But if it is, then it would be
lost (by r7-1, it's not bound to a talisman nor held by a player), and
so by the Gallery's ordinances it would end up there.

> Is a Referendum correcting this oversight advisable
> (or even legal)?

I don't think so.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss