[s-d] Re: Peter submits p341

Peter Cooper Jr. on Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:18:03 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: Peter submits p341

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [s-d] Re: Peter submits p341
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:18:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <410-22006151321351400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Mark Walsh's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:13:51 -0800")
References: <410-22006151321351400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)

"Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Should Section IV in the rules specify that Death is responsible?

I don't think that's needed, as the description already says that
Death is responsible for tracking the locations of Talismans. So, now
Death would just track that a talisman was created in the Forge, and
track when it moves to its player.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Peter submits p341
  - From: Mark Walsh

Prev by Date: [s-d] Re: [auto] comex amends p344
Next by Date: [s-d] Re: [auto] Peter submits p342
Previous by thread: [s-d] Peter submits p341
Next by thread: [s-d] Tweak Statuses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread