Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Triller amends p338

[Antonio Dolcetta <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Walsh wrote:
> On: 1/12/06 5:05:03 PM Peter sent:
> > Subject: [s-d] Re: [auto] Triller amends p338
> >
> > Triller has amended p338.:
> > > Motion 338/1: Annulled Motions Permit Legislating Interests To Undo
> > > Decided Extraneousness.
> > >
> > > [[AMPLITUDE ]]
> > I like that acronym.
> >
> > > [[ This in anticipation of a Proposal removing Proposal ]]
> > Not sure what you mean by anticipation to me... It looks to me like
> > this prop already allows one to change Pending Props to be Annulled.
> This does nothing to recreate a used pen. That's what I think
> Antonio wanted to do when e 'Recalled' eir motion.
> Someone will have to propose that changing a proosal type to
> annulled destroys that pen and creates a new pen.
> This just creates a mechanism for voiding a submitted motion.

Nah, I simply wanted to get rid of it.
But the pen recovering thing is Peter's idea, so I'll let him propose it.
I'll go with something else.



--

	Antonio
    http://gelo.dolcetta.net
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss