[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Triller submits p338

[Antonio Dolcetta <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Triller has submitted a new Motion, p338.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Motion 338/0: Annulled Motions Permit Legislating Interests To Undo Decided Extraneousness.
> A Proposal by Triller
> Last modified on nweek 104, nday 1
>
> [[AMPLITUDE ]]
> [[ This in anticipation of a Proposal removing Proposal ]]
> [[ Changing the type to Annulled eliminates problems
> with reserializing Motions if one is removed. ]]
>
> In Rule 2-6, after the sentence "Motions
> are initially Pending." add:
> {{
> A Pending Motion may have its type changed
> to the Motion type "Annulled" by the Object
> that submitted it.
> An "Annulled" Motion is a type of Motion which
> will have no effect, and will not be Voted on.
> }}

what does the "will not be Voted on" part mean ?
what happens if someone annulles a motion during the voting period  and 
someone has already voted on it ?

--

	Antonio
    http://gelo.dolcetta.net
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss