Mark Walsh on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:44:55 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Peter submits p316 |
On: 12/21/05 5:44:02 PM Peter sent: > Subject: Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Peter submits p316 > > Daniel Lepage wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2005, at 12:27 PM, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Peter has submitted a new Motion, p316. > >> Motion 316/0: Amendment Simplifying Propinator Room Ordinances Better > >> A Proposal by Peter > >> Last modified on nweek 102, nday 12 > > > > This won't get an acronym bonus, because Propinator isn't a Nomic Word > > (it's never mentioned in the rules themselves). > > Hmm. r3-9.2.D only mentions that the acronym needs to be a Nomic Word, not > that each word in the acronym needs to be. (For the alliterative bonus, > each word has to be a Nomic word. But not for the acronym bonus.) > > I smell a prop coming on. :) > The plot thickens! Tril _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss