[s-d] Re: [auto] Peter votes

["Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Dec 17, 2005, at 7:53 PM, Peter voted:
>> Motion 311/0: Uncommonly Good Talismans                : Against
>
> Any particular reason? I didn't propose this just to make my other
> prop work. I really do think that having "Uncommon" as a rarity makes
> sense, because some things shouldn't be that common but also might not
> warrant the restrictions associated with being Rare.

How would uncommon be different from common? If there's a distinction
between them I don't mind having it, but it feels weird that there'd
be two rarities that behaved identically...

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss