[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Prop 290 didn't bounce to me.

David E. Smith on Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:59:31 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Prop 290 didn't bounce to me.

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Prop 290 didn't bounce to me.
From: "David E. Smith" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:52:08 -0600
In-reply-to: <uu0e1ec9w.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <410-22005115251243950@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <uu0e1ec9w.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)

Quoting "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Yeah, there appears to be an issue with the web page sending email...

Yet another instance of Gentoo sucking through a straw. Hopefully willbe fixed

in an hour or two.

dave

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Recall Motions are Open
Next by Date: [s-d] RE: [s-b] Submission of prop 292
Previous by thread: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Recall Motions are Open
Next by thread: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Prop 290 didn't bounce to me.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread