Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] RE: rachel attacks Rainbow Wolfe

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ooops. Told you I hadn't been keeping up with the game. Apologies. I guess I
read the forward lines and got confused.

Started to read the current rules on my break though... very nice. They seem
somewhat tidier than when I last read them.

- Rainbow

On 20/10/05, flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>>rachel sent (from [s-d]):
> >>> From: Rachel Kadel-Garcia <rachel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Date: 10/14/05 7:06:06 PM
> >>> Subject: [s-d] Game action
> >>>
> >>> I attack Rainbow Wolfe.
> >>>
>
> >>triller sent:
> >>I recognize this.
> >>Dice to follow.
> >>Triller
> This because a Minister can recognize an action
> posted to a non-public forum as a legit action if
> the Minister then reposts it to a public forum.
> See Rule 1-3 (2nd paragraph).
>
> So to clarify a point:
>
> >Rainbow sends:
> >I've not really been keeping up with the game
> >too much since you (triller) and flutesultan
> >(rachel) joined.
>
> I (triller) am flutesultan.
> Rachel Kadel-Garcia is rachel.
> I wouldn't want you to think that I had anything
> other than duty to do with this.
>
> Triller
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



--
Just think what you know to think, say what you know to say, and do what you
know to do. Everyday, lots and lots.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss