Chris Le Sueur on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:24:00 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] pronoblem votes |
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 18:04 +0000, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > pronoblem's votes: > Motion 214/0: Repeatedly Add More Points : Against > Motion 243/0: Seeking Self Soul Securing : For > Motion 244/0: Stop Selective Soul Seizing : For > Motion 245/1: Surpassing Simplifying Subtraction Stuff : Abstain > Motion 246/0: Selective Soul Spending Should Satisfy : For > Motion 247/4: Trying to Take Tiles To Tomorrow : For > Motion 249/1: Test Prop : Abstain > Motion 250/0: Test Prop : Abstain > Motion 253/0: Yes, I am Insane : Against > Against, but agree on the insane part. > > Motion 254/0: Proposal of Ending Tiles : Against Weren't they last nweek's proposals? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss