[s-d] Re: Eugman's Prop 237

Peter Cooper Jr. on Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:00:23 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: Eugman's Prop 237

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [s-d] Re: Eugman's Prop 237
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:00:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <41200580282346120@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx's message of "Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:46:1 -0700")
References: <41200580282346120@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)

flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> What do we do about Eugene's Prop 237?
> Technically, it was amended after the start
> of the voting period.
> I'm OK with that. Its present form is far
> superior to its original.

Well, I tried to change the text in the database back to the
pre-amended version. I think I was successful.

Probably the best thing to do would be for em to re-propose it next
nweek.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Eugman's Prop 237
  - From: flutesultan

Prev by Date: [s-d] Re: subdomain
Next by Date: [s-d] Re: [auto] EugeneMeidinger votes
Previous by thread: [s-d] Eugman's Prop 237
Next by thread: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] DQT votes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread