Peter Cooper Jr. on Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:31:46 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: Prop 214 |
flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > I missed something when updating the Roster. > > I thought Prop 214 gave a double amplitude bonus, > But actually it reads: > {{ > Give each player who voted a positive number > on this proposal Amplitude equal to twice the > value e voted. > }} > > I gave 2A to the FOR voters, but if a FOR vote > is 2, it looks like the four of us should receive > 4A. > > Peter, Wonko, DQT. Comments? That was the intent, yes. Players voting 1 got 2A, and players voting 2 (a.k.a. FOR) got 4A. > Another slant. > A non-abstain vote gets 1A by the Rules. > By this prop should we receive 4A on top of that > for FOR votes? Yes, that was the intent there as well. It doesn't say anything like "instead of the normal Amplitude bonus" or "double the normal amount". It just gives out Amplitude. Nothing stops more than one effect from giving out Amplitude at the same time. -- Peter C. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss