FW: RE: [s-d] Head of ministry prop.

[flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Sorry. Once again I'm bouncing without looking.
Triller

> It would have given you, as Super, blanket 
> authority over assets not in your purview.
> Triller
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx (discuss)>
>  > Date: 8/10/05 4:39:09 PM
> > Subject: [s-d] Head of ministry prop.
> >
> > I'm curious as to why DQT and triller shot it down as no reason is give
in their votes.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss