eugman on Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:02:13 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Vetoing |
> > I veto proposal 201 (Suddenly super seems simple). > > Classes balence themselfs because they interact well > > with each other. Powers don't. And it seems to much > > like a "First to the buzzer." subgame where the first > > person to post that e wants some powers will get them > > while everyone else waits for the 4 day period to pass > > or pays 250 for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. > Hmmm. I strongly suspect that there's supposed to be an "e" in there. > As in, "When attempting to take ownership of a power, that player must > pay 50 genechips for every power **e** claimed in the last 4 days." Yeah that was the intent. I wish someone had pointed out the omission to me. > I'm a bit disappointed by the veto, though - it would have been trivial > to tweak, and you just made three or four of my props completely > worthless. Ditto. > What exactly don't you like about the way powers interact? Apparently he thinks there is a lack of checks and balances. Apprently he didn't read prop 219 which seemed to be a good start for putting a check on other powers. Now what happens if the props pass? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss