Daniel Peter Lepage on Fri, 5 Aug 2005 08:12:51 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] MY problems with current props. |
> P199 > Doesn't seem like the advatages of that rule will ever affect many people. It wouldn't be an advantage if everybody had it. > p205 > The teleport seems a bit powerful. Of course if you made it so there was > a 1 nday delay in teleporting then people could reek havoc by moving your > pod. DAmage should probably be lowered since 10 is default health > currently. You can only create pods at your location, so the teleport doesn't do you much good except as a way to quickly return to a place you've already been. I expect it will be more useful when players take passageways that other players can't take (say, because a Golem can't enter the Closet to go through a secret passage at the back). Then a smaller player can go through carrying a pod, after which the contraption holder can teleport past to join em. > p206 > Thumb of smiting seems slightly too powerful since that unless I had 30 > health and was very lucky the priest could kill me with a 1-2 smackdown of > smite and punch. I'll lower it to twenty, but as long as the Soul-Sucker allows necromancers to strip priests of their powers, I think there needs to be a check on your class. > P208 > The bonding thing is a problem. May want to limit it to rare and unique > so you know you'll get something good. Also doesn't cover getting a second > rare copy. Also it says from the attic implying the talismans there are > useless. Also why not have the fall down to the front hall? > > p209 > We need a way to deal with uber-talismans . > > p212 > I really don't want more classes especiallyones that don't mesh with > current ones. > Make your prop compatible with my superpower prop and I might vote for it. Why don't you want more classes? Worst-case scenario is that everyone picks a different species and class, in which case it's just as though they were all superpowers. > p218-p219 > > Instead of purely conditional you could make them do something interesting > but not that important or contraversial incase my prop fails. Hmm. I might do that, if I get a chance today. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss