Peter Cooper Jr. on Fri, 1 Jul 2005 06:57:39 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [auto] JessicaCooper submits p145

automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> JessicaCooper has submitted a new proposal, p145.
> ---------------------------------
> Proposal 145/0: "Maybe" offsets real parity; help is near, gentlemen!
> A Standard Proposal by JessicaCooper
> Last modified on nweek 92, nday 12
> 'Tis in the int'rest of majority
> To keep up some sort of voting parity.
> Therefore I submit:
> Where there are vote types in list,
> To add "maybe not" for posterity.

You might want to clarify this, so that you don't add Maybe Not to the
Legal Votes for Tweaks, CFIs, and Referenda. (Unless that was your
intent, but I don't think that it was.)

> "And what," one might ask, "will this vote do?"
> I will add to 3-3/10, bullet two,
> Right at the end
> I request to append:
> {{
> Plus the number of "maybe nots" over two
> }}

You could just add the number of Maybe Nots without dividing, or else
they won't really do much.

Right now, FOR is 2 votes for, MAYBE is 1 vote for, and AGAINST is 2
votes against. You probably just want MAYBE NOT to be 1 vote against,
which means that you shouldn't divide it by two.

Peter C.
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea."
		-- RFC 1925, "The Twelve Networking Truths", #3
spoon-discuss mailing list