Daniel Peter Lepage on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:12:12 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] EugeneMeidinger submits p143 |
> EugeneMeidinger has submitted a new proposal, p143. > > --------------------------------- > Proposal 143/0: Talismans are becoming unique! > A Standard Proposal by EugeneMeidinger > Last modified on nweek 92, nday 11 > > [[Tabu. Look it up]] Alternate spelling for Taboo, I believe, which is a ban or an inhibition resulting from social custom or emotional aversion. <http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry?id=T0004900> > Add to the end of rule 7-2 the following: > {{ > > All talismans have a rarity. A rarity of rare means only one talisman of > that name is allowed per player. A rarity of rare means a player may not > have multiple copies of that talisman. A rarity of unique means that that > talisman may not be created if a copy already exists. Any other rarities > have no effect. > }} After "All Talismans have a rarity" you have two sentences that seem to say the same thing - a player can't have more than one vs. a player can't have multiple ones. > Give all talismans a rarity of common. > Give Small White Rabbit a rarity of Unique. > Give Talisman of Bureaucracy a rarity of rare.[[Redundant isn't it?]] > Give Chad a rarity of rare. > Replace the last sentence of Chad's effects with the following: > {{ > Players may only use a Chad during a voting period and make one before a > voting period. > }} How about "Players may not create Chads during Voting, and may not use them outside of Voting"? As it stands, you're mixing singulars ("a Chad") with plurals ("Players") and it's a bit confusing to read. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss