Peter Cooper Jr. on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:49:43 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [auto] TheVoice submits p136 |
This prop (making only one person a judge for a CFI) doesn't really handle what to do if the person selected doesn't vote on it... You end up with it failing automatically, which seems bad. (I could submit a CFI that "Peter has not won" and hope that judge selected isn't actually around that week.) I'm not really sure what this is hoping to accomplish... I think that major decisions like CFIs ought to be decided by all the players as a whole, especially since a majority can change the rules however they want anyway. In terms of making it compatible with the Game-changing Objects structure that I made last nweek, I think that you just want to change "Eligible Voters on a CFI are all players except for the Plaintiff and Defendant of that CFI." to be a different method of selecting that set (even if you only want that set to be one player). That way, CFIs work just like everything else. (And if someone wants to prop a better name than Game-changing Objects, I'd be all for it.) -- Peter C. "The best cure for insomnia is to get a lot of sleep." -- W. C. Fields _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss