The Voice on Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:46:58 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: cfi

Shoot... did I mis-edit the statement?  Crap.  Anyway, I argue that
the CFI is still valid and good to have in the gamestate to set up the
precedent about the  common usages of words and such.  Just seems like
a good thing to have established.

On 6/14/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Voice <voiceofnomic@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Statement: The purchases of (10^100 - 2) sentry guns, a Capacitors, an
> > Advanced Targeting, a Shield Overload, and Steam Tower Upgrade
> >
> > This CFI is now /actually/ Open.  Players have until roughly 9:30 EDT
> > on Thursday to submit eir votes.
> I vote REFUSED. First of all, the statement doesn't include a verb.
> Furthermore, the purchases weren't recognized anyway. DQT could submit
> a CFI if e wanted saying that the purchases were legal, but since
> we're playing the game as though they weren't, having a CFI stating
> something that's already true doesn't really make much sense.
> --
> Peter C.
> "The best cure for insomnia is to get a lot of sleep."
>                 -- W. C. Fields
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx

.o0(The Voice)
spoon-discuss mailing list