Rainbow Wolfe on Sun, 29 May 2005 16:52:10 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] An Obvious win. |
Aargh! De-ja-vu! I'm sure someone propped this in the previous ruleset. Okay, so assuming you have won what now... oh wait, nothing. We just continue playing. - RW On 5/29/05, Dan Schmidt <tiber264@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This loophole was so obvious that I wonder how it got > in. > > I propose a proposal named "Loophole" with the > following text: > {{ > Create a rule called "42" with the following text. > {{ > Dyslexic Q-Thief may change the rules. > > Dyslexic Q-Thief may win. > }} > }} > There is nothing prohibiting me from making 100^1000 > Voting Entities named "Bob" so I do so. > > There is also nothing prohibiting me from making > "Loophole" change from Pending to Open. I then force > all Voting Entities named "Bob" to vote FOR on > "Loophole". Then I make "Loophole" change from Open to > Historical. > > I win. > > I then create a rule named "The All-Important Default > Case" with the following text. > {{ > Game Objects may not change the game state. > > This rule defers to all other rules. > }} > I then repeal "42". > > And before you post to S-D stating how I didn't win > for some reason please remeber that if this doesn't > work, then all of last Nweek's Add-on purchases neven > happened because nowhere in the Ruleset does it say > that one can purchase Add-ons. > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss