[s-d] Re: [s-b] Re: Fwd: Re: **Tweak Tweak**

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

Okay - objecting to tweak #8

creating chaos and tweak #9

insert the following paragraph between the first paragraph and the second:
"Tweaks MUST be declared by using the word 'tweak' in the subject header."

[removal of revisable objects...although the count gets higher. :) ]

- RW

On 5/25/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Amend Rule 0-0: Tweaks,
> >
> > insert the following paragraph between the first paragraph and the 
> second:
> > "Tweaks MUST be declared by using the word 'tweak' in the subject 
> header."
> >
> > apend to the last sentence:
> > "Tweaks are revisible objects."
> 
> This is recognized as Tweak #8, expiring Mon May 30 23:48:14 2005
> UTC. There are no seconds or objections to it as of yet.
> 
> > [[I think the problem here is that people are assuming that documents 
> are
> > revisable automatically, and should be specified otherwise. Are any
> > rulebooks sppecified as revisable? If not, then we should have as many
> > copies as updates.]]
> 
> All that making them revisable object does is give them version
> numbers. You'd still need some way for someone to be able to edit
> them. And you don't want someone to be able to edit them 2 minutes
> before they expire to be "I win". Objecting to the old tweak and
> creating a new one seems like a reasonable solution to me, as it
> accomplishes pretty much the same thing.
> 
> --
> Peter C.
> "And there was sleep deprivation only juniors can know,
> And seniors haven't worked off yet..."
> -- Jessi, "random memorabilia in nonprose form"
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss