Re: [s-d] Re: Wonko submits p86

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 17, 2005, at 12.42 PM, Sonnet Nazi wrote:

> This comment is made qua player rather than qua Grammar Nazi.  (I've
> always wanted to use that word in a real sentence.)
>
> <i> "able to propose one fewer proposal that nweek than they would
> otherwise."</i>
>
> The use of the word "that" would imply that this effect does not
> continue into other weeks, yet the rest of the rule implies that the
> "one fewer proposal" effect is cumulative.  What is the intention
> here?  If it is still intended to be cumulative over a period of
> several nweeks, I would recommend that you change the word "that" to
> "each," or address this in some other manner of your choosing.

At the beginning of each nweek, a player who made many violations gets 
some Suck Points knocked off and loses one prop just for that nweek. I 
don't want to kick people out of the game, I just want to spray them in 
the face with a small water bottle.

But I'll try to make that clearer.

--
Wonko

Life is anything that dies when you stomp on it.
     -Dave Barry (1947 - )

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss