Alex Truelsen on Fri, 13 May 2005 17:38:34 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] JessicaCooper submits p86 |
This is very well done and you probably deserve some sort of reward for your effort despite not fitting into an existing form, but there is a very good reason I included non-iambic sonnets in the allowed forms, and that is that iambic pentameter is a bitch. I personally have never managed to create a sonnet in actual iambic pentameter, despite my best efforts. This, of course, is why managing to do so gets you a bonus and the right to act superior. So, I will be voting against this proposal on the grounds that it would needlessly make specialty proposals just a little more inaccessible. [[BvS]] On 5/13/05, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > JessicaCooper has submitted a new proposal, p86. > > --------------------------------- > Proposal 86/0: Sonnets need iambs, please! > A Standard Proposal by JessicaCooper > Last modified on nweek 88, nday 5 > > I know not whence your definitions came, > Nor where you learned your literary stuff, > But you malign the Bard of England's name > By not researching sonnet form enough. > > 'Twas Petrarch who first wrote in sonnet style > And set its meter how it's always been: > Five iambs needs each line to stand the trial > Of what makes sonnets sonnet-like; and then > > The rhyme scheme has a plethora of choice. > Shakespearean's the one in this par'digm, > For English has not what Petrarch enjoys: > All reg'lar romance language verbs can rhyme. > > So let the definition read like this:{{ > ABABCDCDEF > EFGG a sonnet's rhyme scheme is; > Five iambs do comprise each line by def, > > And fourteen lines exact should sonnets get.}} > Where this rule now says just "sonnet" plain, > Let's make it say "Shakespearean sonnet," > And where that latter term is now in play, > > Expunge it from rule three-dash-nine-oh's text, > And that all sonnets are Shakespearean > The genechip section should instead reflect. > Thus updated, the form the rule'd be in: > > {{2.C: Shakespearean Sonnet Proposals > A Shakespearean Sonnet Proposal is a proposal which is in Shakespearean > sonnet form. ABABCDCDEFEFGG a sonnet's rhyme scheme is; five iambs do > comprise each line by def, and fourteen lines exact should sonnets get. > Whether the title of a Shakespearean Sonnet Proposal is included in the > Shakespearean sonnet is up to the creator of the Shakespearean Sonnet > proposal. If a Shakespearean Sonnet Proposal passes, its creator is awarded > 14 Genechips and the right to act very superior for one nweek. If a Sonnet > Proposal fails, its creator is awarded seven Genechips. If the Shakespearean > sonnet was identical to a Shakespearean Sonnet created in a previous > proposal, no Genechips are awarded.}} > [[If that makes the proposal not in iambic pentameter, that kind of sucks, > but the text really needs to be included for clarity's sake.]] > > Good luck to you, aspiring sonnetteers; > I hope that you amend two cee in fear. > > [[I know this is much too long to be a sonnet. I tried, but there was no > way to fit it all.]] > > --------------------------------- > > This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki. > Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be > ignored. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss