Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] RainbowWolfe amends p16

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nope - that's what I meant. Otherwise you may have points hanging
around until that exact set of allied players plays again... assuming
they ever do.

- RW

On 4/25/05, Jimmy Kaplowitz <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:35:39AM +0000, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> > A successful play gives the allied players the maximum number of
> > points available to em, divided by the number of allied players who
> > played that word. Any remaining points that cannot be shared without
> > breaking a whole integer are to be saved and added to the next
> > successful alligned word play.
> 
> So, if two allied players would score 19 points together (giving them
> each 9), a subsequent play with a separate two-person alliance would get
> an extra point? Assuming you didn't mean this, I'd suggest changing the
> last sentence to end: "... are to be saved and added to the next
> successful word play of that alliance."
> 
> - Jimmy Kaplowitz
> bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss