Martin R Crowther on Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:38:27 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: Rule 33 |
RW----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:28 AM Subject: [s-d] Re: Rule 33
Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:Just an observation: Every Refresh Proposal that wants to replace the ruleset will have to do something clever to get around r33, which states that it cannot be modified or repealed without a 3/4 majority of all players. In mine, at least, I'll probably do something like "remove all players who didn't vote for this Refresh Prop from the game, then remove the last paragraph of r33, then reinstate those players with all the same attributes as though they hadn't been evicted from the game".Hmm. That's... interesting. We should have done that before (a few nweeks back now) when trying to modify r33... Although if it's that easy to get around, there's not much point in it being there. Also, one might be able to argue that r0 supersedes r33 since r0 has Chutzpah 8 and r33 han Chutzpah 2, but that might not actually work.Also, just as a thought for something to do when we start over, who'd be interested in a Scrabble-based subgame? I'm thinking something like Knightmare Chess, but with Scrabble instead of Chess.Sounds cool to me. -- Peter C. "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." -- Al Gore, March 9, 1999, On CNN's Late Edition _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss