Re: [s-d] A Proposed new Ruleset

["Martin R Crowther" <cybersanctuary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Admittedly I haven't (still) completely read through Wonko's rules. I will 
so shortly, when I get time, but the initial look was good.

...I missed the rolling prop thing, I assumed it would (had I read it fully) 
have followed the procedure we currently have. Personally, I would prefer 
rolling props as it gives a continuation letting people vote on items that 
are up for voting at the time they log in. I can see the problem though, 
that with inactivity, we could end up with many historical docs - although 
we could have just as many daft props active - but then that would give 
people an incentive to vote... maybe.

I'll vote for it anywhich way it goes though, although I would have 
suggested the rolling props except I though that the timing was pretty much 
set up anyway. (as far as definate things go in Nomic) :) I thought it'd be 
impractical to set up from the system we are on. Oh well. Maybe we'll keep 
it to one side (maybe toggle :P ) for a rainy day. We can always test it to 
see how it goes.

Suppose I better go and read the rules propoerly now.

(And does that mean sub games can now have their own numbered section?? 
Assuming something is defined as a subgame - and I suppose that someone 
would have to suggest that it had its own numbered section.)

RW


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss