[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Wonko votes

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
[snip]
> Proposal 1984/4: Alcohol again                            : Shelve
> There's no good reason provided for why anyone would want a nonzero BAC - any
> thing that requires you to roll a die with *every single action* is far more 
> trouble than it's worth. If I had had nonzero BAC during the Stock Scam and t
> his rule had been in place, I would have had to hit the list with a roll of 2
> 000000000d10, which might not even be allowed by the dice roller (if its smar
> t it'll forbid any roll large enough to stall the machine)

I don't remember the upper limit I hard-coded is anymore, but it's well 
under 2 trillion.

-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss