Phil Ulrich on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:34:23 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached |
a) Yes. b) No. On Nov 26, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Jeremy Cook wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:43:11PM -0600, Joel Uckelman wrote:Thus spake SkArcher:What I would propose is a third forum: Spoon-noticesThis forum would be for rules-mandated posts - Anything that was automated would post here, and this would be where the ballot was posted. The ReplyTo: header for s-n would be s-bHey, do you guys still want this? I'm back in "do-things-long-neglected" modefor a few days---I'll do it this evening if it's still needed.That would be better than the current system. I don't think the business/discuss distinction is currently useful: my ideal would be to just have one player forum. I do think an automated forum would be useful. I call a Straw Poll with two parts: a) add a s-n forum: Yes/No b) abolish b/d distinction: Yes/No Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss