Re: [s-d] Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 26, 2004, at 5.16 PM, Jeremy Cook wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:43:11PM -0600, Joel Uckelman wrote:
> > Thus spake SkArcher:
> > > What I would propose is a third forum: Spoon-notices
> > >
> > > This forum would be for rules-mandated posts - Anything that was 
> > > automated
> > > would post here, and this would be where the ballot was posted. The 
> > > Reply
> > > To: header for s-n would be s-b
> >
> > Hey, do you guys still want this? I'm back in 
> > "do-things-long-neglected" mode
> > for a few days---I'll do it this evening if it's still needed.
>
> That would be better than the current system. I don't think the
> business/discuss distinction is currently useful: my ideal would be to
> just have one player forum. I do think an automated forum would be
> useful.
>
> I call a Straw Poll with two parts:
>
> a) add a s-n forum: Yes/No
>
> b) abolish b/d distinction: Yes/No

a) Yes, b) No.

While a notices forum would be useful, I quite appreciate the 
distinction between business and discuss. I filter them into separate 
folders, which makes it easy when I'm pressed for time to figure out 
what needs dealing with and what can be read later at my leisure.

--
Wonko

"What is improbable is extremely probable."
   - Aristotle

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss