Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Wonko submits p1952

[Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:31:20PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:35:48 +0000 (GMT), automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Wonko has submitted a new proposal, p1952.
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Proposal 1952/0: A few little fixes
> > A Standard Proposal by Wonko
> > Last modified on nweek 73, nday 6
> > 
> > In r1900, The Board Game, replace the sentence "In order to perform a Move, a player must include with it an accurate textual representation of the board." with
> > "In order to perform a Move, a player should include with it an accurate textual representation of the board. If e does not, the Minister of the Board may reject the Move at eir discretion, in which case the Move fails and has no effect."
> 
> The minister of the board can play too, right? Can't he make an
> illegal move, then choose, at his discretion, to not reject it?

Well then the move Platonically didn't happen, so e'd lose a CFI against
him.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss