Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Squid, take 2

[Jake Eakle <jseakle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I really don't think you are in any place to be criticizing other people's
strict interpretations.. : ) And besides, that's what Nomic is all about:
passing stupid, loophole-riddled rules and then figuring out what they
actually do. Of course a black hole is on the same square as itself. What
other square would it be on? And unless I'm very much mistaken, it is piece.
Therefore, it is a piece on the same square as a black hole, no?

--Personman


On 11/21/04 3:13 PM, "Jeremy Cook" <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 03:04:19PM -0800, Jake Eakle wrote:
>> What happened is that the black hole destroyed itself, because it was on the
>> same square as a black hole. This made all subsequent moves illegal, because
>> they did not include accurate representations of the board, excepting the
>> one I made after pointing the above out. your last move was also illegal,
>> for the same reason.
> 
> Aaargh... Black Holes don't destroy themselves. Doesn't your doctrine of
> strict interpretation even allow you to interpret "any piece on the same
> square as a Black Hole" to exclude the Black Hole itself?
> 
> Zarpint
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss